Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1461

reference
343-tree-1
name
1461
tree-preservation-order

undefined

343-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.019035 50.894834)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018964 50.894826,-1.018967 50.894840,-1.018977 50.894853,-1.018992 50.894863,-1.019012 50.894869,-1.019034 50.894872,-1.019056 50.894870,-1.019076 50.894863,-1.019092 50.894854,-1.019102 50.894841,-1.019106 50.894827,-1.019103 50.894813,-1.019093 50.894801,-1.019077 50.894791,-1.019058 50.894784,-1.019036 50.894782,-1.019014 50.894784,-1.018994 50.894790,-1.018978 50.894800,-1.018968 50.894812,-1.018964 50.894826)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL